Broker States vs Non-Broker States: Complete Guide to Medicaid NEMT Models Across All 50 States
Medicaid NEMT operates under seven distinct management models across all 50 states and Washington, D.C. Whether a state uses a statewide broker, regional brokers, direct operation, or a mixed model determines how providers get credentialed, how patients request rides, and how claims get paid. This guide classifies all 51 jurisdictions using the CCAM Transportation Assistance Committee taxonomy and explains what each model means for NEMT providers and the patients they serve.
If you operate an NEMT company, manage a facility discharge department, or coordinate patient transportation, this state-by-state reference tells you exactly which entities control Medicaid transportation in every jurisdiction. For billing codes and claims procedures, see our companion NEMT billing ICD-10 codes guide.
Illinois provider or facility? Dream Care Rides handles both FFS and MCO pathways.
What Are NEMT Broker States and Non-Broker States?
The distinction centers on who manages Medicaid transportation benefits. In a broker state, the state Medicaid agency or its managed care organizations contract with a third-party transportation broker — companies like ModivCare, MTM (Medical Transportation Management), or First Transit — to receive ride requests, verify eligibility, authorize trips, assign providers, and process payments. The broker acts as an intermediary between the patient, the state, and the transportation company.
In a non-broker state (also called directly operated), the state Medicaid agency manages NEMT internally. Providers enroll directly with the state, patients request rides through the state agency, and claims are submitted to the state without a broker intermediary. These states may still contract out specific functions like call center operations, but the management authority stays with the state.
This matters because the model determines three things for every NEMT stakeholder:
- For providers: Who you must credential with, who assigns you trips, and who pays your claims
- For patients: Who you call to schedule rides, how far in advance you must book, and who handles complaints
- For facilities: Which entity coordinates discharge transport, how billing documentation flows, and which providers are in-network
Most states do not fit neatly into "broker" or "non-broker." The majority use hybrid approaches where fee-for-service Medicaid operates under one model and managed care operates under another. The CCAM Transportation Assistance Committee developed a seven-category classification system to capture this complexity.
The Seven NEMT Management Models — CCAM-TAC Classification
The CCAM (Community of Care Alliance for Mobility) Transportation Assistance Committee classifies state Medicaid NEMT programs into seven models based on how each state structures broker relationships and direct operations. Understanding these categories is the foundation for navigating NEMT enrollment and billing in any state.
1. Directly Operated / Fee-for-Service
The state Medicaid agency manages NEMT in-house. No third-party broker. Providers enroll with the state, bill the state, and receive prior authorization from the state. This is the simplest model for providers but requires the state to maintain its own transportation coordination infrastructure.
2. Regional Broker — State Contracted
The state divides its territory into geographic regions and contracts with a different broker for each region. The state holds the contracts directly (not through MCOs). Providers may need to credential with multiple brokers if they serve patients across regions.
3. Regional Broker — MCO Contracted
Managed care organizations (MCOs) — not the state directly — contract with brokers to cover specific geographic regions within the MCO's service area. The state oversees MCOs, and MCOs oversee brokers. Providers credential with the MCO's designated broker for each region.
4. Statewide Broker — State Contracted
One broker holds a single contract covering the entire state, awarded directly by the state Medicaid agency. All Medicaid NEMT trips flow through this one broker. This is the most common single-entity model and was historically dominated by ModivCare (formerly LogistiCare) and MTM.
5. Statewide Broker — MCO Contracted
Each MCO contracts with one broker to manage NEMT across the MCO's entire statewide footprint. Different MCOs may use different brokers, meaning providers potentially credential with multiple brokers depending on which MCO patients belong to.
6. Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO
The state operates NEMT directly for fee-for-service enrollees while MCOs use regional brokers for managed care enrollees. This is Illinois's model. Providers must enroll at both the state level (for FFS) and with MCO brokers (for managed care), creating a dual-track system.
7. Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO
A statewide broker handles FFS Medicaid or a base population, while MCOs layer on regional brokers for their managed care members. This creates overlapping broker territories and requires providers to track which broker covers which patient population.
8. Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker State
The state operates NEMT directly in some regions and contracts with brokers in others. The state itself (not MCOs) holds the broker contracts for the brokered regions. Providers in state-operated regions enroll with the state; providers in brokered regions enroll with the regional broker.

Complete State-by-State NEMT Model Table
The following table classifies all 50 states and Washington, D.C. by their NEMT management model according to the CCAM-TAC framework. States are grouped by model type for quick reference. Scroll horizontally on mobile devices.
| State | NEMT Model | Primary Broker(s) / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Directly Operated / FFS | State Medicaid agency manages directly |
| Alaska | Directly Operated / FFS | State Medicaid agency manages directly |
| Maryland | Directly Operated / FFS | State Medicaid agency manages directly |
| Montana | Directly Operated / FFS | State Medicaid agency manages directly |
| North Dakota | Directly Operated / FFS | State Medicaid agency manages directly |
| South Dakota | Directly Operated / FFS | State Medicaid agency manages directly |
| Wyoming | Directly Operated / FFS | State Medicaid agency manages directly |
| Arkansas | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| Georgia | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| Kentucky | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| Maine | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| Massachusetts | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| South Carolina | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| Vermont | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| Washington | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| West Virginia | Regional Broker — State Contracted | State contracts with regional brokers |
| Kansas | Regional Broker — MCO Contracted | MCOs contract with regional brokers |
| Oregon | Regional Broker — MCO Contracted | MCOs contract with regional brokers |
| Connecticut | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Delaware | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Idaho | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Missouri | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Nevada | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| New Jersey | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| New York | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Oklahoma | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Rhode Island | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Utah | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Wisconsin | Statewide Broker — State Contracted | Single statewide broker under state contract |
| Tennessee | Statewide Broker — MCO Contracted | MCOs each contract a statewide broker |
| Arizona | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| California | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| Florida | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| Hawaii | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| Illinois ★ | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS via HFS/IMPACT; MCOs use ModivCare, MTM, First Transit |
| Minnesota | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| Nebraska | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| New Mexico | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| North Carolina | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| Ohio | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO | FFS direct; MCOs use regional brokers |
| District of Columbia | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| Indiana | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| Iowa | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| Louisiana | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| Mississippi | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| New Hampshire | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| Texas | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| Virginia | Mixed: Statewide + Regional Broker MCO | Statewide broker for FFS; MCOs add regional brokers |
| Colorado | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker State | State operates some regions; brokers in others |
| Michigan | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker State | State operates some regions; brokers in others |
| Pennsylvania | Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker State | State operates some regions; brokers in others |
Source: CCAM Transportation Assistance Committee classifications. Models may shift as states rebid contracts or restructure managed care programs. Last verified March 2026.
Directly Operated States — How They Work
Seven states — Alabama, Alaska, Maryland, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming — manage Medicaid NEMT without any broker intermediary. In these states, the state Medicaid agency handles everything: provider enrollment, ride scheduling, prior authorization, and claims payment.
How providers operate in directly operated states:
- Enroll directly with the state Medicaid agency as an NEMT provider
- Meet state-specific vehicle inspection, insurance, and driver training requirements
- Receive trip assignments from the state scheduling system or accept ride requests from patients
- Submit claims directly to the state Medicaid program
- Receive payment from the state at state-set reimbursement rates
Advantages for providers: Higher per-trip reimbursement rates (no broker margin), simpler enrollment with one entity, direct relationship with the payer, and fewer administrative intermediaries.
Disadvantages for providers: Lower trip volume (state scheduling systems may be less efficient at matching riders with providers), less technology for real-time dispatching, and the provider may bear more administrative burden for documentation and compliance.
Statewide Broker States — The Dominant Model
Eleven states use a statewide broker contracted directly by the state (Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Utah, and Wisconsin), plus Tennessee uses an MCO-contracted statewide broker model. In these states, one organization manages all Medicaid NEMT for the entire state or for each MCO's full membership.
How the statewide broker model works:
- The state awards a contract (often through a competitive RFP) to a single transportation broker
- The broker builds a network of local NEMT providers by credentialing companies willing to accept the broker's contracted rates
- Patients call the broker's centralized phone line or use an online portal to request rides
- The broker verifies Medicaid eligibility, authorizes the trip, and assigns a local provider
- The provider completes the trip and submits documentation to the broker
- The broker processes the claim and pays the provider at the contracted rate
The major statewide NEMT brokers nationally include ModivCare (formerly LogistiCare / Providence Service Corporation), MTM (Medical Transportation Management), and First Transit. ModivCare historically held the largest market share before filing Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2025.
For providers: Statewide broker states offer consistent trip volume because the broker aggregates all Medicaid rides into one dispatch system. The trade-off is lower per-trip rates — the broker retains a management fee from the state's per-member allocation before paying providers. Providers must meet the broker's credentialing requirements, which may differ from the state Medicaid enrollment requirements.
Regional Broker States — Divided Territories
Nine states use state-contracted regional brokers (Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, South Carolina, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia). Two states use MCO-contracted regional brokers (Kansas and Oregon). In this model, the state or its MCOs divide the geography into zones and contract a separate broker for each.
What regional brokering means for providers:
- A provider operating in multiple regions must credential with each region's broker separately
- Each broker may have different credentialing timelines, documentation requirements, and payment terms
- Trip rates and volume may vary significantly between regions
- Crossing regional boundaries on a single trip may involve coordination between two brokers
Advantages: Regional brokers often have better local knowledge, faster response times, and more accountability to the communities they serve. A broker failing in one region does not affect the entire state.
Disadvantages: More administrative overhead for multi-region providers. Patients who live near regional borders may face scheduling friction if their medical providers are in a different broker's territory.
Mixed Model States — Including Illinois
The majority of states — 21 states plus D.C. — use some form of mixed model. Mixed models combine two or more of the approaches above, usually splitting along the line between fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid and managed care (MCO) Medicaid. The three mixed model variants are:
- Direct + Regional Broker MCO (10 states including Illinois): The state operates NEMT directly for FFS enrollees. MCOs contract with regional brokers for managed care enrollees.
- Statewide + Regional Broker MCO (8 states + D.C.): A statewide broker handles FFS or a base population. MCOs layer regional brokers for managed care members.
- Direct + Regional Broker State (3 states): The state runs NEMT directly in some geographic regions and contracts with brokers in others.
Mixed models create the most complexity for providers. A single transportation company may need to maintain enrollment at the state level, credentialing with one or more MCO brokers, and awareness of which patients fall under which pathway. Billing procedures, prior authorization requirements, and payment timelines differ between the FFS and MCO tracks within the same state.
For a detailed breakdown of billing codes and claims procedures across these pathways, see our NEMT billing ICD-10 codes guide, which covers HCPCS codes, origin/destination modifiers, and Illinois-specific claims submission.
Illinois Deep-Dive — How the Mixed FFS + MCO Broker Model Works
Illinois is classified as Mixed: Direct + Regional Broker MCO. This means two parallel systems run simultaneously for Medicaid NEMT, depending on whether the patient is enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicaid or a managed care organization.
Fee-for-Service (FFS) Pathway
Patients on traditional Medicaid (not enrolled in an MCO) have their NEMT managed directly by the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services (HFS). The process works as follows:
- Providers enroll with Illinois HFS through the IMPACT (Illinois Medicaid Program Advanced Cloud Technology) portal
- Prior authorization is handled by Transdev/NETSPAP — this entity is the prior authorization manager, not a broker. Transdev/NETSPAP authorizes trips but does not assign providers or process payment
- Providers submit claims directly to Illinois HFS
- HFS pays providers at state-set fee-for-service rates
- Since January 1, 2022, non-emergency ground ambulance transport for MCO enrollees is also billed directly to HFS, not the MCO
Managed Care (MCO) Pathway
The majority of Illinois Medicaid enrollees are in managed care. Each MCO contracts with a transportation broker to manage NEMT for its members:
- Major Illinois MCOs include Meridian Health Plan, Molina Healthcare, CountyCare, and Blue Cross Community Health Plan
- MCO-contracted brokers include ModivCare, MTM, and First Transit (assignments vary by MCO and region)
- Patients call their MCO's broker to request rides
- The broker verifies eligibility, authorizes the trip, and assigns a credentialed NEMT provider
- Providers submit trip documentation to the broker
- The broker processes payment at the broker's contracted rates
What This Means for Illinois NEMT Providers
To serve the full spectrum of Illinois Medicaid patients, an NEMT provider must:
- Enroll with Illinois HFS through the IMPACT portal (for FFS patients and ground ambulance)
- Credential with each MCO broker that operates in the provider's service area
- Maintain separate billing workflows — HFS claims for FFS patients, broker claims for MCO patients
- Track prior authorization through Transdev/NETSPAP for FFS trips and through the MCO broker for managed care trips
Dream Care Rides operates from Olympia Fields, IL within this mixed model. The company maintains active enrollment at the HFS level and credentialing with MCO brokers, allowing it to serve both FFS and managed care patients. For Illinois-specific rates: ambulatory transport costs $35 to $65 base plus $2 to $4 per mile, wheelchair transportation costs $65 to $115 base plus $3 to $6 per mile, and stretcher transportation costs $300 to $525 base plus $5 to $16 per mile.
Use our NEMT cost calculator for trip-specific private pay estimates, or review the full breakdown on our Illinois NEMT rates page.
How Broker Models Affect NEMT Providers
The NEMT model in your state directly shapes your business operations. Here is a practical comparison of how different models affect providers:
| Factor | Directly Operated | Broker (Statewide/Regional) | Mixed Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment | State agency only | Broker credentialing | State + broker(s) |
| Per-trip rates | Higher (no broker margin) | Lower (broker retains fee) | Varies by pathway |
| Trip volume | Lower | Higher (aggregated dispatch) | Split between pathways |
| Payment speed | 30-90 days (state) | 30-60 days (broker) | Depends on pathway |
| Admin complexity | Low | Medium | High |
| Rate negotiation | None (state-set) | Possible with broker | Mixed |
Key takeaway for multi-state providers: If you operate across state lines, you need separate enrollment and credentialing strategies for each state. A provider serving Illinois (mixed model) and Indiana (statewide + regional broker MCO) faces different broker relationships, billing systems, and compliance requirements in each state.
Regardless of model, building direct relationships with facilities — hospitals, dialysis centers, skilled nursing facilities — generates trip volume independent of broker assignments. Dream Care Rides maintains hospital discharge partnerships and dialysis transportation contracts that supplement broker-assigned trips.
How Broker Models Affect Patients
The NEMT model in your state determines your experience as a Medicaid transportation user. Here is what differs across models:
Scheduling Rides
Broker states: You call a single phone number or use an online portal. The broker assigns a provider and gives you a confirmation number. Directly operated states: You may need to find an enrolled NEMT provider yourself, schedule directly with them, and then seek reimbursement from the state — or the state may run its own call center.
Advance Notice
Most broker states require 48 to 72 hours advance notice for non-urgent trips. Directly operated states may have different timelines. Standing orders for recurring trips (dialysis, chemotherapy) reduce the need for repeated scheduling in both models.
Complaint Resolution
Broker states: Complaints go to the broker first, then the MCO, then the state Medicaid agency. Directly operated states: Complaints go directly to the state Medicaid agency. Broker states add a layer of dispute resolution. In either model, patients have the right to file a formal grievance with their state Medicaid program.
Provider Choice
In broker states, the broker selects the provider based on availability, proximity, and cost. Patients typically cannot choose a specific company. In directly operated states, patients may have more flexibility to select a preferred provider. In either model, private pay NEMT eliminates scheduling restrictions entirely — you choose your provider, your schedule, and your vehicle type.
If your Medicaid transportation is unreliable — late pickups, no-shows, long wait times — private pay is an alternative with no broker intermediary. Call Dream Care Rides at (708) 505-6994 to schedule directly.
ModivCare Bankruptcy (2025) — Industry Impact on NEMT Brokers
ModivCare, Inc. — formerly known as Providence Service Corporation and later LogistiCare — filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in August 2025. As the largest NEMT broker in the United States, ModivCare managed Medicaid transportation contracts in dozens of states, handling over 45 million trips annually prior to the filing.
What caused the bankruptcy: ModivCare accumulated significant debt through a series of acquisitions, including its 2021 purchase of Simplura Health Group (home health services) for $575 million. Rising operating costs, driver shortages, and reduced Medicaid reimbursement rates in several states compressed margins. The company's debt load became unsustainable against its operating cash flow.
Impact on states and providers:
- Operations continued during bankruptcy proceedings under court protection
- Multiple states activated contingency plans and accelerated contract rebids
- Some states transitioned contracts to MTM, First Transit, or regional providers
- Providers in ModivCare-served states experienced payment delays during the transition
- States that relied on a single statewide ModivCare contract faced the highest disruption
Industry implications for 2026 and beyond:
- Concentration risk is real: States dependent on one statewide broker are reconsidering the model
- Regional broker and direct models may gain favor: Spreading risk across multiple entities or returning to state operation
- Provider diversification is critical: Companies that relied solely on ModivCare for trip volume were disproportionately affected
- The NEMT market continues growing: Industry analysts project the U.S. NEMT market to grow from approximately $17.45 billion in 2025 to $25.43 billion by 2032, driven by aging demographics and Medicaid expansion
The bankruptcy reinforced that NEMT providers should maintain multiple revenue streams: state enrollment for FFS, credentialing with multiple brokers, direct facility partnerships, and private pay services. Dependence on a single broker creates a single point of failure.
What NEMT Providers Should Do in 2026
Based on the current state landscape and the post-ModivCare environment, NEMT providers should take the following actions to protect and grow their operations:
- Maintain direct state enrollment even in broker states. If your state shifts models or a broker exits, you need active state-level credentials to continue operating. Do not let your state enrollment lapse just because all your current trips come through a broker.
- Credential with every broker in your service area. In mixed models, this means both FFS enrollment and MCO broker credentialing. In regional broker states, enroll with all regions you can serve. More broker relationships equal more trip sources.
- Build facility relationships independent of brokers. Hospitals, dialysis centers, skilled nursing facilities, and physician offices generate trip referrals regardless of which broker is in play. When a broker changes, your facility relationships persist.
- Monitor state RFPs and contract rebids. States are rebidding NEMT contracts more frequently in the wake of the ModivCare bankruptcy. New RFPs create opportunities to become a preferred provider under a new broker or to bid directly as a regional operator.
- Develop a private pay revenue stream. Private pay trips — patients paying directly without Medicaid, Medicare, or broker involvement — provide higher margins and are not subject to broker assignment or rate negotiations. Many patients who experience poor Medicaid transportation service are willing to pay privately for reliability.
- Invest in compliance documentation. As states tighten oversight following the ModivCare disruption, expect more frequent audits, stricter credentialing reviews, and increased documentation requirements. Providers with organized records will survive audits; those without will lose contracts.
Dream Care Rides operates this exact multi-track strategy from Olympia Fields, IL: enrolled with Illinois HFS, credentialed with MCO brokers, partnered with hospitals and dialysis centers, and serving private pay patients directly. To discuss partnerships or schedule transport, call (708) 505-6994.
Illinois Facility or Provider? Let's Work Together.
Dream Care Rides handles FFS billing, MCO broker coordination, and private pay transport from Olympia Fields, IL. Learn more about Medicaid rides in Illinois.
Frequently Asked Questions: NEMT Broker States vs Non-Broker States
What is an NEMT broker state?
A broker state is one where the state Medicaid agency or its managed care organizations contract with a third-party transportation broker to manage non-emergency medical transportation benefits. The broker receives ride requests from patients, verifies Medicaid eligibility, authorizes trips, and assigns local transportation providers. Major NEMT brokers include ModivCare, MTM, and First Transit.
What is a non-broker (directly operated) state?
A non-broker state manages NEMT through the state Medicaid agency itself, without contracting a third-party broker. Providers enroll directly with the state, bill the state Medicaid program, and prior authorization runs through the state agency. As of 2026, seven states operate this way: Alabama, Alaska, Maryland, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming.
What NEMT model does Illinois use?
Illinois uses a mixed model combining direct operation and regional MCO-contracted brokers. Fee-for-service Medicaid enrollees have trips managed directly by the state through HFS and Transdev/NETSPAP for prior authorization. Managed care enrollees have NEMT arranged through brokers contracted by their MCO, such as ModivCare, MTM, or First Transit. Providers must enroll with both HFS and the MCO brokers to serve the full Medicaid population.
How did the ModivCare bankruptcy affect NEMT services?
ModivCare filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2025 after accumulating significant debt from acquisitions. Operations continued during bankruptcy proceedings under court protection, but multiple states accelerated contingency planning. Some states transitioned contracts to MTM, First Transit, or regional providers. The bankruptcy highlighted concentration risk in the NEMT broker industry and prompted several states to reconsider their reliance on single statewide brokers.
Do NEMT providers need to enroll with brokers in every state they serve?
Yes. Each state has its own enrollment requirements, and broker states require providers to credential separately with each broker operating in that state. A provider serving patients in both Illinois and Indiana would need Illinois HFS enrollment plus MCO broker credentialing in Illinois, and separate enrollment with the Indiana NEMT program and its brokers. There is no national NEMT provider license.
Which NEMT model pays providers the highest rates?
Directly operated states and fee-for-service programs generally pay higher per-trip rates because there is no broker intermediary taking a management fee. In broker states, the broker receives the full Medicaid allocation and pays providers a contracted sub-rate. However, broker states often deliver higher trip volumes because the broker handles scheduling and dispatch. The net revenue depends on volume versus per-trip margin.
Can a state switch from a broker model to a direct model?
Yes, states can change their NEMT management model through legislative action, Medicaid waiver amendments, or contract rebidding. The ModivCare bankruptcy in 2025 prompted several states to evaluate alternatives, including returning to direct operation or splitting statewide contracts into regional zones. Any model change requires federal CMS approval if it involves a Medicaid waiver.
How do patients request rides in broker states versus non-broker states?
In broker states, patients call a centralized broker phone line or use the broker's online portal to schedule rides. The broker assigns a provider. In non-broker states, patients may need to arrange transportation themselves with a Medicaid-enrolled provider and submit claims for reimbursement, or the state may operate its own scheduling system. Broker states generally offer a more streamlined scheduling process for patients.
What happens to NEMT services when a state changes brokers?
When a state transitions between brokers, there is typically a 90- to 180-day transition period. During this time, the outgoing broker continues operations while the incoming broker credentials providers, builds its network, and tests scheduling systems. Patients should experience minimal disruption, but providers may need to re-credential with the new broker. Trip volume often dips temporarily during transitions.
How much does NEMT cost in Illinois for private pay patients?
For private pay patients in Illinois, ambulatory transport costs $35 to $65 base fare plus $2 to $4 per mile. Wheelchair van transport costs $65 to $115 base fare plus $3 to $6 per mile. Stretcher transport costs $300 to $525 base fare plus $5 to $16 per mile. Weekend surcharges are 1.5x and holiday surcharges are 2.25x. Call Dream Care Rides at (708) 505-6994 for exact pricing based on your route.